login to your account contact
 
graphic design



Introduction
Choose Your Scenario
Model District Cost Drivers



Elementary Schools
Class Size and Planning Time
Small Group Support
Individual Tutoring
Staffing Strategies



Secondary Schools
Class Size and Scheduling
Staffing Strategies



Professional Development
School-based PD
Individual Careers/Other PD



Compensation and Time
Teacher Compensation
Instructional Time



Reports and Results
Budget Summary
Per Pupil Costs

The Elementary Schools section of the District Resource Allocation Modeler (DREAM) presents several strategies that can lead to improved teaching and learning at the elementary school level.

By addressing class size, scheduling, student grouping, teacher-to-student ratios, and overall staffing levels, these strategies help districts create conditions in which teachers have more time to collaborate and focus instruction and attention on the needs of each student.

  • Class Size and Planning Time — Class size can be a powerful lever in supporting achievement. Although costly, significant class size reductions in the early grades and around literacy and math can make a lasting difference in student performance. Conversely, increasing class size during non-core academic instruction can yield savings to fund other district improvement strategies.

    High performing districts also incorporate Common Planning Time for teachers into the everyday life of their schools. Research demonstrates that teachers should dedicate at least one ninety-minute planning session each week to productive team planning that addresses student learning goals, curriculum, and assessment.

  • Small Group Support — Research indicates that regularly dividing students into teacher-supported small groups, especially in literacy and math, allows more personalized and effective instruction. High performing schools allocate staff flexibly, providing scheduled, skilled-based support from resource teachers and staff at critical times throughout the day. Small Group Support can be a cost effective way of individualizing attention without reducing class sizes across the school or district.

  • Individual Tutoring — Providing scheduled support to individual students helps improve performance by meeting student learning needs that can be difficult to address through whole-class instruction. This is particularly true when the support is aimed at strengthening student skills, especially in literacy and math. The Individual Tutoring page allows you to explore individual tutoring options, including designating the frequency and extent of tutoring for students in your district.

  • Staffing Strategies — High performing schools explicitly shape the work of all staff positions so that every staff member supports the school's instructional design goals. These schools minimize the number of non-instructional staff and synchronize the work of their non-classroom instructional staff with the work of their classroom teachers. The Staffing Strategies page allows you to make changes to Administrative, Instructional Support, and Student Services staff positions and compensation.

 
choose your scenario  |  model district cost drivers  |  privacy policy  |  terms of use


Copyright © 2005-09 Education Resource Strategies.  All rights reserved.

We encourage you to use this model and to share it with anyone else who is dedicated to improving student performance through the strategic use of school resources.  Selling this tool is expressly prohibited.  See Terms of Use.

This research was supported by the School Finance Redesign Project at the University of Washington's Center on Reinventing Public Education through funding by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Grant No. 29252.  The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and are not intended to represent the project, center, university, or foundation.

This strategic resource allocation tool is designed to assist users in evaluating the costs of select educational program elements and alternatives.  Neither ERS nor the School Finance Redesign Project endorses the use of any of the specific elements/alternatives contained in the tool, endorses the use of the elements/alternatives in the tool over other elements/alternatives, or guarantees the effectiveness of the tool elements/alternatives relative to improving student outcomes.  Users of the tool bear sole responsibility for consequences associated with using the output of the tool and/or implementing the elements/alternatives in the tool.